|
|
Frequently Asked Questions
|
Q. Why do you recommend that
Magic-Dots only be used on an SP chart and not on an ES chart?
A. There is no problem trading the
e-mini. The issue is which chart to use to generate the signals. The
reason an S&P chart is strongly recommended is because one of
the key features of Magic-Dots is its ability to read price patterns.
And since SP price bars have 10 ticks per point vs. 4 for the ES, price
patterns form quite differently on an SP chart than they do on an ES.
The result is that Magic-Dots generates very different (and much less
reliable) signals on the ES chart.
Q. How can I trade Magic-Dots automatically?
A. If by "automatically" you mean using
TradeStation's Strategy Automation to execute orders directly to your
account with little-to-no human intervention, then there are two ways:
1) the recommended way, and 2) the not recommended way.
The recommended way is to apply Magic-Dots
Mechanical system to a 5-min S&P chart (not an ES chart) and
then use TradeBolt to send orders automatically to a broker that
interfaces with TradeBolt, like Interactive Brokers or Global Futures
for instance. I have used TradeBolt in this manner and it is easy to
use and keeping track of order flow is also easy and confusion-free.
The not recommended way can be done of course, but
it just isn't, well, recommended. That is to apply Magic-Dots
Mechanical system to a 5-min ES chart and let the system send orders
directly to your TS account. This approach works fine in every way
except one--the system is designed specifically to read SP price bars,
which have 10 ticks per point vs. 4 for the ES, and therefore, it fires
VERY different signals on the ES chart. The solution to this relies on
TradeStation offering symbol substitution in Strategy Automation. I
have heard that TS is considering this but how soon it will come is
anybody's guess.
There is another good solution. That is to use the
system in "semi-automatic." Here you apply Magic-Dots Mechanical system
to a 5-min S&P chart and set it up so that it sends orders to a
TradeManager window. Then just follow the system-generated trades by
placing orders yourself. When the system enters, you enter. When it
covers, you cover. When it stops and reverses, you stop and reverse,
etc. I have also used this method myself and it works quite well.
Q. Why does the performance report that I generate
differ from ones I have seen in the past?
A. This is one of the inherent
limitations with hypothetical systems and back-tested performance.
Every time I make a change to the system code, the results for the
system change. I've made a number of programming changes over the last
few weeks that have changed the specific profit performance,
particularly on a day-to-day and week-to-week basis. However, I do
strive to keep the overall system performance in the same ballpark from
version to version.
|
|